An Evaluation of Good and Evil in the Movie Midday, noon, noonday, noontide, twelve noon and Putting on the Ethical Theories of Kant and Mill Raymond Parenteau

PHI2000

Unit three or more Assignment you

Capella University

Apr, 2014

Preface

For the functions of this conversation, the concepts of good and evil will be analyzed through the use of two different ethical ideas, Utilitarianism and Deontology. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the thinker John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or motives are not correct or incorrect; rather the morality of the choice or perhaps act depends upon the outcome or perhaps result. Utilitarian's believe effects can be determined prior to an action plus the ethical options are one which provides the best effect or most happiness for the greatest amount of people (e. g., pleasure, joy, health, understanding, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a way to some other end, it does not stand on its own to be intrinsically ethical. In contrast to this kind of theory is definitely Deontology related to philosopher Immanuel Kant. Where a utilitarian focuses on the outcome of an action to determine the ethical choice, Deontology dictates the choice, actions, or means themselves has to be ethical no matter the outcome. The Movie

High Noon starts as Marshal Will Sl?de is getting committed to Amy. At the same time 3 members of recently freed murderer Frank Miller's bunch arrive in community to meet Frank who is coming in on the Midday train. Callier is returning exact payback on Kane, the Marshal who had directed him to prison. At first Kane determines to run from the looming issue at the urging of his new partner and his good friends, but in the finish, he comes back to city and need to face Burns and his gang alone. The Analysis

An analysis of good and bad in the movie High Noon (Fred Zinnemann, 1952) is impossible because though evil is definitely clearly symbolized in the film, good can be not. An assumption of evil on the other hand may be presumptuous depending upon the way the actions regarded evil are viewed. Honest Miller can be intent on revenge and killing Kane is just how he expects to actual it. Via a Deontological point of view this course of action would undoubtedly be deemed evil, wrong and unethical as Burns cannot possibly justify the option or action to kill Kane. Even so based on Utility theory Miller's action could possibly be justifiable. It could be possible a consequence of Kane's tough by Callier would provide an improved outcome to get a greater number of individuals. If this were the case, a Functional would assert Miller's activities to be the the majority of ethical and therefor very good. For this examination however , the use of Deontology for this scenario will stand and Miller will probably be deemed associated with evil. Characters which appear able to represent good for the objective of this newspaper are not basically making a great ethical or moral decision to do " good”, rather they are without option. Inside the absence of a choice, which will require a decision based on personal ethical rules or morality, any actions and/or the consequence cannot be deemed very good. Therefor this kind of paper will expand upon the supposition " good” is certainly not present because an asset in High Noon, and just how the honest theories of Kant and Mill may potentially apply to some of the characters while developed in the movie. While Marshal Sl?de becomes aware that Frank Callier, the pardoned murderer he helped set aside, is on the noon train back into community, it is recognized he begins to struggle with the moral and ethical dilemma he at this point faces. He could be newly committed and contains a responsibility to his bride. He provides retired since the Marshal, but this kind of leaves this town with no Marshal for the next a day and Callier is interested in vengeance, intending to make very good on a risk to come back to town and kill Sl?de. Even as Kane races on vacation with his new bride in the urging of his close friends, to escape a confrontation with Miller, it really is apparent he can still unable to make a great ethical decision relating to leaving the town and...

References: Wendy Zinnemann. (Director). (1952). High Noon [Motion picture]. Us: Paramount Pictures.

Sommers, C., & Sommers, F. (2013). Immanuel Margen: Good Can, Duty and the Categorical Imperative. In Vice & Advantage in Everyday routine: Introductory Blood pressure measurements in Ethics (9th male impotence. ) Boston: Clark Baxter.

Sommers, C., & Sommers, F. (2013). John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism. In Vice & Virtue in Everyday routine: Introductory Psychic readings in Integrity (9th male impotence. ) Boston: Clark Baxter.

Tags:

theme of avarice in Volpone Essay

Robberbarons in American Background Essay